000			03661cam a2200385 a 4500
001			17787431
003			JGU
005			20230806020020.0
007			Hard bound
008			130621s2013 enka b 000 0 eng d
010			_a 2013371522
015			_aGBB2B7763 _2bnb
016	7		_a016215740 _2Uk
020			_a9781849462716
035			_a(OCoLC)ocn819521268
040			_aUKMGB _beng _cUKMGB _dOCLCO _dYDXCP _dCDX _dILI _dBWK _dOWT _dUAB _dBWX _dGZL _dDLC
042			_alccopycat
050	0	0	_aK7680 _b.U82 2013
082	0	4	_a342.3 _222 _bUS-
245	0	4	_aUse of foreign precedents by constitutional judges
260			_aOxford _bHart _c2013
300			_axxxviii,431p. _bill. _c25 cm.
490	1		_aHart studies in comparative public law _vv. 1
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
505	0	0	_gIntroduction : _tthe methodology of the research : how to assess the reality of transjudicial communication? / _rTania Groppi and Marie-Claire Ponthoreau -- _gPt. 1: _tReference to foreign precedents by the Australian High Court: a matter of method / _rCheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone.-- _tCanada: protecting rights in a "worldwide rights culture", an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2010) / _rGianluca Gentili -- _tIndia: a "critical" use of foreign precedents in constitutional adjudication / _rValentina Rita Scotti -- _tThe Supreme Court of Ireland and the use of foreign precedents: the value of constitutional history / _rCristina Fasone -- _tIsrael: creating a constitution: the use of foreign precedents by the Supreme Court (1994-2010) / _rSuzie Navot -- _tNamibia: the Supreme Court as a foreign law importer / _rIrene Spigno -- _tSouth Africa: teaching an "old dog" new tricks? an empirical study of the use of foreign precedents by the South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010) / _rChrista Rautenbach -- _gPt. 2: _tAustria: non-cosmopolitan, but Europe-friendly: the Constitutional Court's comparative approach / _rAnna Gamper -- _tLifting the constitutional curtain? the use of foreign precedent by the German Federal Constitutional Court / _rStefan Martini -- _tHungary: unsystematic and incoherent borrowing of law: the use of foreign judicial precedents in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 1999-2010 / _rZoltán Szente -- _tA gap between the apparent and hidden attitudes of the Supreme Court of Japan towards foreign precedents / _rAkiko Ejima -- _tMexico: struggling for an open view in constitutional adjudication / _rEduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor and Rubén Sánchez Gil -- _tRomania: analogical reasoning as a dialectical instrument / _rElena Simina Tanasescu and Stefan Deaconu -- _tRussia: foreign transplants in the Russian Constitution and invisible foreign precedents in decisions of the Russian Constitutional Court / _rSergey Belov -- _tJudges as discursive agent: the use of foreign precedents by the Constitutional Court of Taiwan / _rWen-Chen Chang and Jiunn-Rong Yeh -- _tUnited States of America: first cautious attempts of judicial use of foreign precedents in the Supreme Court's jurisprudence / _rAngioletta Sperti -- _gConclusion: _tThe use of foreign precedents by constitutional judges: a limited practice, an uncertain future / _rTania Groppi and Marie-Clair Ponthoreau.
650		0	_aJudgments, Foreign. _924753
650		0	_aStare decisis. _935789
650		0	_aConstitutional courts. _935409
700	1		_aGroppi, Tania _947516
700	1		_aPonthoreau, Marie-Claire _947517
906			_a7 _bcbc _ccopycat _d2 _encip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2ddc _cBK _011
999			_c31638 _d31638