000 | 02931namaa2200409uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | oapen41869 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
005 | 20231220155203.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 200923s2020 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | _ampub.19360 | ||
024 | 7 |
_a10.3998/mpub.19360 _2doi |
|
040 |
_aoapen _coapen |
||
041 | 0 | _aeng | |
042 | _adc | ||
072 | 7 |
_aJH _2bicssc |
|
100 | 1 |
_aDeshpande, Madhav M. _4auth _91560307 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCritical Studies in Indian Grammarians I _bThe Theory of Homogeneity (Savar?ya) |
260 |
_aAnn Arbor _bUniversity of Michigan Press _c2020 |
||
300 | _a1 electronic resource (241 p.) | ||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 1 | _aMichigan Series In South And Southeast Asian Languages And Linguistics | |
506 | 0 |
_aOpen Access _fUnrestricted online access _2star |
|
520 | _aIn the historical study of the Indian grammarian tradition, a line of demarcation can often be drawn between the conformity of a system with the well-known grammar of Pa?ini and the explanatory effectiveness of that system. One element of Pa?ini's grammar that scholars have sometimes struggled to bring across this line of demarcation is the theory of homogeneity, or savar?ya, which concerns the final consonants in Pa?ini's reference catalog, as well as phonetic similarities between sounds. While modern Sanskrit scholars understand how to interpret and apply Pa?ini's homogeneity, they still find it necessary to unravel the history of varying interpretations of the theory in subsequent grammars. Madhav Deshpande's The Theory of Homogeneity provides a thorough account of the historical development of the theory. Proceeding first to study this conception in the Pa?inian tradition, Deshpande then passes on to other grammatical systems. Deshpande gives attention not only to the definitions of homogeneity in these systems but also the implementation of the theory in those respective systems. Even where definitions are identical, the concept may be applied quite differently, in which cases Deshpande examines by considering the historical relationships among the various systems. | ||
536 | _aAndrew W. Mellon Foundation | ||
536 | _aNational Endowment for the Humanities | ||
540 |
_aCreative Commons _fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ _2cc _uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 | 7 |
_aSociology & anthropology _2bicssc _9851605 |
|
653 | _aSociology and anthropology | ||
793 | 0 | _aOAPEN Library. | |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/45138c97-35a2-45ce-a1dd-bc633d65a634/9780472901708.pdf _70 _zOpen Access: OAPEN Library, download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/41869 _70 _zOpen Access: OAPEN Library: description of the publication |
999 |
_c3068629 _d3068629 |