000			01831nam a22002537a 4500
003			JGU
005			20250211020015.0
008			220913b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9780197644386 _qhbk.
020			_z9780197644393
040			_beng _cJGU
041			_aeng
100	1		_aAlschner, Wolfgang, _eauthor _91636638
245	1	0	_aInvestment arbitration and state-driven reform : _bnew treaties, old outcomes / _cWolfgang Alschner.
260			_aNew Delhi : _bOxford University Press, _c2022.
500			_aBased on author's thesis (doctoral - Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (Geneva, Switzerland), 2015) issued under title: State-driven change in international investment law and its (uncertain) impact on investor-state arbitration.
520			_a"A textbook summary of how international investment law developed over the past fifty years may go something like this. States signed thousands of largely similar international investment agreements (IIAs) to protect the property of their investors abroad. Most of these IIAs allowed foreign investors to sue host states via investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) for treaty breaches. ISDS was barely used until the late 1990s. When ISDS claims finally surged, states realized that their treaties offered greater investment protection than intended. States reacted by narrowing the commitments offered in newly concluded agreements. This backlash against investment arbitration resulted in a "new generation" of IIAs that rebalanced investment protection and host state regulatory autonomy"--
650		0	_aInvestments, Foreign _xLaw and legislation.
650		0	_aInternational commercial arbitration.
650		0	_aInternational and municipal law. _921504
999			_c2733074 _d2733074