000			03239cam a2200337 a 4500
001			16294157
005			20161019020003.0
007			Hard bound
008			100621s2010 enk b 001 0 eng
020			_a9780521199339
040			_c0
082	0	0	_a343.8 _222 _bWA-I
100	1		_aWang, Faye Fangfei
245	1	0	_aInternet jurisdiction and choice of law _blegal practices in the EU, US and China
260			_aNew York _bCambridge University Press _c2010
300			_axiv,261p.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 241-250) and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Jurisdiction in electronic contracting -- EU rules applied in cyber jurisdiction -- US jurisdiction tests employed in e-contracting disputes -- Chinese legislation on jurisdiction -- Choice of law in electronic contracting -- EU internet choice of law regime -- US internet choice of law rules -- Chinese internet choice of law approaches -- Alternative dispute resolution and the internet -- The legal obstacles and solutions to online arbitration and online mediation -- Conclusion and recommendation.
520			_a"The adoption of electronic commercial transactions has facilitated cross-border trade and business, but the complexity of determining the place of business and other connecting factors in cyberspace has challenged existing private international law. This comparison of the rules of internet jurisdiction and choice of law as well as online dispute resolution (ODR) covers both B2B and B2C contracts in the EU, USA and China. It highlights the achievement of the Rome I Regulation in the EU, evaluates the merits of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreement at the international level and gives an insight into the current developments in CIDIP. The in-depth research allows for solutions to be proposed relating to the problems of the legal uncertainty of internet conflict of law and the validity and enforceability of ODR agreements and decisions"--
520			_a"Internet Jurisdiction and Choice of Law: Legal Practices in the EU, US and China takes a "solutions to obstacles" approach, examines the existing jurisdiction and choice of law rules and proposes the interpretation of those rules to the digital age. It discusses the need of the modernisation and harmonisation of private international law, compares current legislative frameworks in the EU, US, China, and suggests a series of ways to remove the obstacles of the determination of Internet jurisdiction and choice of law for cross-border electronic B2B and B2C contracts"--
650		0	_aConflict of laws _xElectronic commerce _zChina.
650		0	_aConflict of laws _xElectronic commerce _zEuropean Union countries.
650		0	_aConflict of laws _xElectronic commerce _zUnited States.
650		0	_aOnline dispute resolution _zChina.
650		0	_aOnline dispute resolution _zUnited States.
650		0	_aOnline dispute resolution _zEuropean Union countries.
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2ddc _cBK _04
999			_c26477 _d26477