000 | 02052cam a2200337 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 20931838 | ||
003 | JGU | ||
005 | 20200615125939.0 | ||
007 | Hardbound | ||
008 | 190404s2019 mau b 001 0 eng c | ||
010 | _a 2019012524 | ||
020 | _a9780674240940 | ||
040 |
_aMH/DLC _beng _erda _cMH _dDLC |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aBR1615 _b.N45 2019 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a261.7 _223 _bNE-T |
100 | 1 |
_aNelson, Eric _985879 |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aTheology of liberalism _bpolitical philosophy and the justice of God |
260 |
_aCambridge _bThe Belknap Press of Harvard University Press _c2019 |
||
300 |
_axii, 218p. _c25 cm |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aPelagian origins -- Representation and the fall -- "The bargain basis": Rawls, anti-Pelagianism, and moral arbitrariness -- Egalitarianism and theodicy -- Justice, equality, and institutions -- "God gave the world to Adam, and his posterity in common": appropriation and the Left-Libertarian challenge -- Conclusion: Back to representation. | |
520 | _aWe think of modern liberalism as the novel product of a world reinvented on a secular basis after 1945. In The Theology of Liberalism, one of the country's most important political theorists argues that we could hardly be more wrong. Eric Nelson contends that the tradition of liberal political philosophy founded by John Rawls is, however unwittingly, the product of ancient theological debates about justice and evil. Once we understand this, he suggests, we can recognize the deep incoherence of various forms of liberal political philosophy that have emerged in Rawls's wake.-- | ||
650 | 0 |
_aLiberalism _xReligious aspects. _xChristianity _985880 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aLiberalism _9612 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aReligion and politics. _985881 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPelagianism _985882 |
|
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||
999 |
_c234436 _d234436 |