| 000 | 02518cam a2200361 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 20799325 | ||
| 003 | JGU | ||
| 005 | 20200318150554.0 | ||
| 007 | Paperback | ||
| 008 | 190104s2019 enk b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | _a 2018061704 | ||
| 020 | _a9781108703918 | ||
| 040 |
_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC |
||
| 042 | _apcc | ||
| 043 | _an-us--- | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aKF4552 _b.F352 2019 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a342.73085 _223 _bFA-N |
| 084 |
_aLAW018000 _2bisacsh |
||
| 100 | 1 |
_aFallon, Richard H _936048 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 4 |
_aNature of constitutional rights _bthe invention and logic of strict judicial scrutiny |
| 260 |
_aCambridge _bCambridge University Press _c2019 |
||
| 300 |
_aix, 212p. _c23 cm |
||
| 490 | 0 | _aCambridge studies on civil rights and civil liberties | |
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 8 | _aMachine generated contents note: 1. The historical emergence of strict judicial scrutiny; 2. Strict scrutiny as an incompletely theorized agreement; 3. Rights and interests; 4. Tests besides strict scrutiny and the nature of the rights that they protect; 5. Legislative intent and deliberative rights; 6. Rights, remedies, and justiciability; 7. The core of an uneasy case for judicial review. | |
| 520 | _a"What does it mean to have a constitutional right in an era in which most rights must yield to 'compelling governmental interests'? After recounting the little-known history of the invention of the compelling-interest formula during the 1960s, The Nature of Constitutional Rights examines what must be true about constitutional rights for them to be identified and enforced via 'strict scrutiny' and other, similar, judge-crafted tests. The book's answers not only enrich philosophical understanding of the concept of a 'right', but also produce important practical payoffs. Its insights should affect how courts decide cases and how citizens should think about the judicial role. Contributing to the conversation between originalists and legal realists, Richard H. Fallon, Jr explains what constitutional rights are, what courts must do to identify them, and why the protections that they afford are more limited than most people think"-- | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aConstitutional law _zUnited States _967055 |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Constitutional _967056 |
|
| 653 | _aStrict scrutiny (Constitutional law) | ||
| 906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||
| 999 |
_c233652 _d233652 |
||