000 | 03111cam a22003257i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 18806523 | ||
003 | JGU | ||
005 | 20230526020017.0 | ||
007 | Hard bound | ||
008 | 151005t20172017enk b 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | _a 2015953853 | ||
020 | _a9780199653836 | ||
035 | _a(OCoLC)ocn971969486 | ||
040 |
_aYDX _beng _cYDX _erda _dIMT _dGSU _dCOD _dQGQ _dCUY _dGTX _dDLC |
||
042 | _alccopycat | ||
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a170 _223 _bDO- |
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aDoes anything really matter? _bessays on Parfit on objectivity |
260 |
_aNew York _bOxford University Press _c2016 |
||
300 |
_axii, 300 p. _c24 cm |
||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_gPreface / by Peter Singer -- _tHas Parfit's life been wasted? : some reflections on Part Six of 'On What Matters' / _rLarry S. Temkin -- _tTwo sides of the meta-ethical mountain? / _rPeter Railton -- _tParfit on normative concepts and disagreement / _rAllan Gibbard -- _tAll souls' night / _rSimon Blackburn -- _tParfit's mistaken meta-ethics / _rMichael Smith -- _tNothing "really" matters, but that's not what matters / _rSharon Street -- _tKnowing what matters / _rRichard Yetter Chappell -- _tNietzsche and the hope of normative convergence / _rAndrew Huddleston -- _tIn defence of reductionism in ethics / _rFrank Jackson -- _tWhat matters about meta-ethics? / _rMark Schroeder -- _gA _tdefense of moral intuitionism / _rBruce Russell -- _tMorality, blame, and internal reasons / _rStephen Darwall -- _tParfit on objectivity and "the profoundest problem in ethics" / _rKatarzyna de Lazari-Radek _gand _rPeter Singer. |
520 | 8 | _a"In the first two volumes of On What Matters Derek Parfit argues that there are objective moral truths, and other normative truths about what we have reasons to believe, and to want, and to do. He thus challenges a view of the role of reason in action that can be traced back to David Hume, and is widely assumed to be correct, not only by philosophers but also by economists. In defending his view, Parfit argues that if there are no objective normative truths, nihilism follows, and nothing matters. He criticizes, often forcefully, many leading contemporary philosophers working on the nature of ethics, including Simon Blackburn, Stephen Darwall, Allen Gibbard, Frank Jackson, Peter Railton, Mark Schroeder, Michael Smith, and Sharon Street. 'Does Anything Really Matter?' gives these philosophers an opportunity to respond to Parfit's criticisms, and includes essays on Parfit's views by Richard Chappell, Andrew Huddleston, Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer, Bruce Russell, and Larry Temkin. A third volume of On What Matters, in which Parfit engages with his critics and breaks new ground in finding significant agreement between his own views and theirs, is appearing as a separate companion volume."-- | |
600 | 1 | 0 |
_aParfit, Derek. _tOn what matters. _956294 |
650 | 0 |
_aEthics. _956295 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aObjectivity. _956296 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSinger, Peter _956297 |
|
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _ccopycat _d2 _encip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK _01 |
||
999 |
_c228960 _d228960 |