000			03109cam a2200373 i 4500
001			17812059
003			JGU
005			20240319020052.0
008			130715s2014 nyu b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2013028338
020			_a9781107444348
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC
042			_apcc
043			_aa-ii---
050	0	0	_aKNS2220 _b.D36 2014
084			_aLAW018000 _2bisacsh
100	1		_aDam, Shubhankar _d1981- _91368
245	1	0	_aPresidential legislation in India _bthe law and practice of ordinances
260			_aCambridge _bCambridge University Press _c2014
490	0		_aComparative constitutional law and policy
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 233-252) and index.
505	0		_aThe transplant effect : early origins of ordinances in England and India -- Legislative surrogacy : cabinets and ordinances, 1952--2009 -- Negotiating the text : ordinances, article 123 and the interpretative deficit -- Reading minds : presidential satisfaction and judicial review of ordinances -- The power of no : presidents, cabinets and the making of ordinances.
520			_a"The legislative process in India's parliamentary system, like elsewhere, is a shared exercise: the executive and the legislature partake in it. Ordinarily, proposals for legislation originate in the cabinet. If the cabinet decides that a law is necessary, a bill is drafted, on occasions, with external inputs. After it is introduced in the two houses, the bill goes through several 'readings', committee hearings and amendments. The final draft is debated and voted on. If a bill secures the requisite majority in both houses, it is sent to the president for assent, upon which the bill becomes an Act. Parliament, in this formal view, is central to the legislative process, and legislation are products of among other things a rational-legal scrutiny and vote. In practice, parliament is less than central; the legislative process rarely confirms to the constitutional ideal type. Take, for example, political parties and their influence on the legislative process. The party to which a government belongs can have a disproportionate say in policy and legislative matters. Indeed, depending on the personalities involved, legislative proposals may even originate and take shape in party headquarters. Or consider a coalition government. A cabinet's decision to introduce a bill may be evidence of compulsion, not necessity. It may be a price for keeping the coalition together or a political maneuvering to secure new allies. Also, consider the influence of non-representative actors and their ability to direct legislative proposals"--
650		0	_aOrders in council. _954173
650		0	_aExecutive orders _zIndia. _954174
650		7	_aLAW / Constitutional. _2bisacsh _954175
653			_aOrdinances
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
999			_c226932 _d226932