| 000 | 03336cam a22003498i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 20173075 | ||
| 003 | JGU | ||
| 005 | 20180804135122.0 | ||
| 008 | 171208s2018 nyu b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | _a 2017058817 | ||
| 020 | _a9781107190245 | ||
| 040 |
_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda |
||
| 042 | _apcc | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aK3175 _b.K65 2018 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aKnight, Dean R _q(Dean Robert) _953915 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aVigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review |
| 260 |
_aCambridge _bCambridge University Press _c2018 |
||
| 263 | _a1111 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aCambridge studies in constitutional law ; _v19 |
|
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 8 | _aMachine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; 2. Scope of review; 3. Grounds of review; 4. Intensity of review; 5. Contextual review; 6. Conclusion. | |
| 520 | _a"The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the Anglo-Commonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. While variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review"-- | ||
| 520 | _a"The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the anglocommonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. while variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review. Dean R. Knight is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Law and Co-Director of the New Zealand Centre for Public Law at Victoria University of Wellington. His scholarly interests include a wide range of topics in constitutional and administrative law, including judicial review and local democracy"-- | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aJudicial review. _953916 |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCommon law. _953917 |
|
| 906 |
_a0 _bvip _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
| 999 |
_c226419 _d226419 |
||