000			01970nam a2200385 i 4500
001			EDZ0002009785
003			StDuBDS
005			20221121165122.0
006			m||||||||d||||||||
007			cr |||||||||||
008			190103s2019 enka fob 001|0|eng|d
020			_a9780191836022
040			_aStDuBDS _beng _cStDuBDS _erda _epn
050		4	_aKD8464
082	0	4	_a347.42012 _223 _bHO-R
100	1		_aHoyle, Carolyn _926964
245	1	0	_aReasons to doubt _bwrongful convictions and the Criminal Cases Review Commission
260			_c2019 _aLondon _bOxford University Press
300			_a1 online resource _billustrations (black and white).
490	1		_aOxford monographs on criminal law and justice
490	1		_aOxford scholarship online
500			_aPreviously issued in print: 2019.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520	8		_aThis text reveals what happens to applications for post-conviction review when those in England and Wales who consider themselves to have been wrongfully convicted, and have exhausted direct appeal processes, apply to have their case assessed by the Criminal Cases Review Commission. It presents the findings of the first thorough empirical study of decision-making and the use of discretion within the Commission. It shows how the Commission exercises its discretionary powers in identifying and investigating possible wrongful convictions for rehearing by the Court of Appeal.
521			_aSpecialized.
610	1	0	_aGreat Britain. _bCriminal Cases Review Commission. _966752
650		0	_aJudicial error _zEngland. _966753
650		0	_aJudicial error _zWales. _966754
700	1		_aSato, Mai _966755
776	0	8	_iPrint version : _z9780198794578
830		0	_aOxford monographs on criminal law and justice. _968181
830		0	_aOxford scholarship online. _966756
856	4	0	_3Oxford scholarship online _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794578.001.0001
942			_2ddc _cEBK
999			_c1281590 _d1281590