000			02101nam a2200349 i 4500
001			EDZ0002079691
003			StDuBDS
005			20220730123642.0
006			m|||||o||d||||||||
007			cr |||||||||||
008			190704r20192018ii fob 001|0|eng|d
020			_a9780199096992 _cNo price
040			_aStDuBDS _beng _cStDuBDS _erda _epn
050		0	_aKNS3497 _b.A97 2019
082	0	4	_a347.5403534 _223 _bAP-
245	0	0	_aAppointment of judges to the Supreme Court of India _btransparency, accountability, and independence
260			_c2019 _aLondon _bOxford University Press
300			_a1 online resource.
490	1		_aOxford scholarship online
500			_aThis edition also issued in print: 2018.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520	8		_aIn Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India, by majority, struck down the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC), established to appoint judges to the Supreme Court of India and High Courts. Unsurprisingly, the NJAC judgment has been the subject of a deeply polarized debate in the public sphere and academia. The essays in this volume analyse the NJAC judgment, and provide a rich context to it, in terms of philosophical, comparative, and constitutional issues that underpin it. The work traces the history of judicial appointments in India; analyses constitutional principles behind selecting judges and their application in the NJAC Case; and comparatively examines the judicial appointments process in six foreign jurisdictions, enquiring into what makes a good judge and an effective appointments process.
521			_aSpecialized.
610	1	0	_aIndia. _bSupreme Court. _995265
650		0	_aJudges _xSelection and appointment _zIndia. _918598
700	1		_aSengupta, Arghya _967037
700	1		_aSharma, Ritwika _953944
776	0	8	_iPrint version : _z9780199485079
830		0	_aOxford scholarship online. _966756
856	4	0	_3Oxford scholarship online _uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199485079.001.0001
942			_2ddc _cEBK
999			_c1281450 _d1281450