000			02123nam a2200361 i 4500
001			EDZ0002025905
003			StDuBDS
005			20220726162815.0
006			m||||||||d||||||||
007			cr |||||||||||
008			190207s2019 enka fob 001|0|eng|d
020			_a9780191846991
040			_aStDuBDS _beng _cStDuBDS _erda _epn
050		4	_aKNW3964
082	0	4	_a364.660959 _223 _bPA-L
100	1		_aPascoe, Daniel _976556
245	1	0	_aLast chance for life _bclemency in Southeast Asian death penalty cases
260			_c2019 _aLondon _bOxford University Press
300			_a1 online resource _billustrations (black and white).
490	1		_aClarendon studies in criminology
490	1		_aOxford scholarship online
500			_aThis edition previously issued in print: 2019.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520	8		_aAll five contemporary practitioners of the death penalty in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore and Vietnam, have performed executions on a regular basis over the past few decades. NGO Amnesty International currently classifies each of these nations as death penalty 'retentionists'. However, notwithstanding a common willingness to execute, the number of death sentences passed by courts that are reduced to a term of imprisonment or where the prisoner is released from custody altogether, through grants of clemency by the executive branch of government, varies remarkably among these neighbouring political allies. In this text, the patterns which explain why some countries in the region award clemency far more often than do others in death penalty cases are explored and explained.
521			_aSpecialized.
650		0	_aCapital punishment _zSoutheast Asia. _976557
650		0	_aClemency _zSoutheast Asia. _976558
776	0	8	_iPrint version : _z9780198809715
830		0	_aClarendon studies in criminology. _968066
830		0	_aOxford scholarship online. _966756
856	4	0	_3Oxford scholarship online _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198809715.001.0001
942			_2ddc _cEBK
999			_c1281292 _d1281292