India and bilateral investment treaties refusal, acceptance, backlash
Material type: TextSeries: Oxford scholarship onlinePublication details: 2019 London Oxford University PressDescription: 1 online resourceISBN:- 9780199097081
- 346.54092 23 RA-I
- KNS971.5
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic-Books | OPJGU Sonepat- Campus | E-Books Perpetual | 346.54092 RA-I (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 700637 |
This edition also issued in print: 2019.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Many countries have started contesting international investment treaties that allow foreign corporations to sue sovereign States for alleged treaty breaches at international arbitration fora. This contestation has taken the form of either countries terminating their investment treaties or walking out of the investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) system. India has also jumped on the contestation bandwagon. As a consequence of being sued by more than 20 foreign investors, India terminated close to 60 investment treaties and adopted a new model bilateral investment treaty (BIT) purportedly to balance investment protection with the host State's right to regulate. This work studies critically India's approach towards BITs by tracing its origin, evolution, and the current state of play.
Specialized.
There are no comments on this title.