TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ginsburg,Tom
TI  - Judicial review in new democracies: constitutional courts in Asian cases / 
SN  - 0521520398
AV  - KNC608 .G56 2003eb
U1  - 347.5035 22
PY  - 2003///
CY  - Cambridge, UK : 
PB  - Cambridge University Press
KW  - Constitutional courts
KW  - East Asia
KW  - Judicial review
KW  - Judicial power
KW  - Democratization
KW  - Cours constitutionnelles
KW  - Extrême-Orient
KW  - Contrôle juridictionnel des lois
KW  - Pouvoir judiciaire
KW  - Démocratisation
KW  - POLITICAL SCIENCE
KW  - Government
KW  - Judicial Branch
KW  - bisacsh
KW  - LAW
KW  - Legal Services
KW  - Civil Procedure
KW  - fast
KW  - Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit
KW  - gnd
KW  - Constitutionele gerechtshoven
KW  - gtt
KW  - Toetsingsrecht
KW  - Südostasien
KW  - swd
KW  - Electronic books
N1  - Includes bibliographical references (pages 265-280) and index; Introduction: the decline and fall of parliamentary sovereignty -- Why judicial review? -- Constituting judicial power -- Building judicial power -- Courts in new democracies -- Confucian constitutionalism? The grand justices of the Republic of China -- Distorting democracy? The constitutional court of Mongolia -- Rule by law or rule of law? The constitutional court of Korea -- Conclusion: comparing constitutional courts
N2  - New democracies around the world have adopted constitutional courts to oversee the operation of democratic politics. Where does judicial power come from, how does it develop in the early stages of democratic liberalization, and what political conditions support its expansion? This book answers these questions through an examination of three constitutional courts in Asia: Taiwan, Korea, and Mongolia. In a region that has traditionally viewed law as a tool of authoritarian rulers, constitutional courts in these three societies are becoming a real constraint on government. In contrast with conventional culturalist accounts, this book argues that the design and functioning of constitutional review are largely a function of politics and interests. Judicial review - the power of judges to rule an act of a legislature or national leader unconstitutional - is a solution to the problem of uncertainty in constitutional design. By providing 'insurance' to prospective electoral losers, judicial review can facilitate democracy
ER  -