TY - BOOK AU - Bilder,Mary Sarah TI - Madison's hand: revising the Constitutional Convention SN - 9780674089006 AV - KF4510 .B55 2015 U1 - 342.7302/92 23 PY - 2015/// CY - Cambridge, Massachusetts PB - Harvard University Press KW - Madison, James, KW - United States KW - Constitutional Convention KW - (1787) KW - Journal of the Federal Convention KW - Journal of the Federal Convention (United States. Constitutional Convention : 1787) KW - fast KW - Constitutional history KW - Sources KW - Histoire constitutionnelle KW - États-Unis KW - HISTORY KW - Revolutionary Period (1775-1800) KW - bisacsh KW - Electronic books N1 - Includes bibliographical references (pages 267-343) and index; I. Notes Before the Constitutional Convention. The genre of legislative diaries ; The practice of working notes -- II. Learning to Keep a Conventional Diary. The success of the opening days ; Struggling with speeches -- III. Recording the Constitutional Convention. An account of failed strategies ; Acquiring a new role -- IV. Abandoning the Notes. The complexity of drafting ; The Convention's changing relevance -- V. Completing the Notes. Correcting and revising the notes ; The influence of Mr. Jefferson N2 - "New digital technologies and traditional historical investigation suggest that James Madison did not finish his famous Notes until after the Convention. The Notes are the most important, and most misunderstood, account of the 1787 Constitutional Convention. This biography of the Notes follows Madison as he created and then repeatedly revised a remarkable manuscript of American history. Originally a diary kept in part for the absent Thomas Jefferson, the Notes highlighted his fascination with the political strategy of drafting. But when the Convention began to draft the details of the Constitution, the complicated process led Madison to abandon his Notes. Only after serving in Congress and drafting new constitutional amendments did Madison return to complete them. By the time the Notes were published a half-century later, the layers of revisions made the Notes appear--inaccurately--to be an objective record of the writing of the Constitution"-- UR - https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=2275712 ER -