Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

The intelligible Constitution : the Supreme Court's obligation to maintain the Constitution as something we the people can understand / Joseph Goldstein.

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: New York : Oxford University Press, 1992.Description: 1 online resource (xx, 201 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 1429406623
  • 9781429406628
  • 1280527773
  • 9781280527777
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Intelligible Constitution.DDC classification:
  • 347.73/26 22
LOC classification:
  • KF8742 .G65 1992eb
Other classification:
  • 86.51
Online resources:
Contents:
Made for an undefined future -- With studied ambiguity : National League of Cities v. Usery and Garcia v. San Antonio Metro Transit Authority -- Had understanding been the goal : Cooper v. Aaron -- Decisions unexplained : the Brown v. Board of Education cases -- Failing to take their own and each other's opinions seriously : Regents of the University of California v. Bakke -- Toward the intelligible Constitution.
Action note:
  • digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve
Summary: A lucid and accessible examination of the Constitution and the manner in which the Supreme Court has failed to communicate its opinions to the public in a comprehensible manner.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books EBSCO Available

Includes bibliographical references (pages 163-194) and indexes.

Made for an undefined future -- With studied ambiguity : National League of Cities v. Usery and Garcia v. San Antonio Metro Transit Authority -- Had understanding been the goal : Cooper v. Aaron -- Decisions unexplained : the Brown v. Board of Education cases -- Failing to take their own and each other's opinions seriously : Regents of the University of California v. Bakke -- Toward the intelligible Constitution.

Print version record.

A lucid and accessible examination of the Constitution and the manner in which the Supreme Court has failed to communicate its opinions to the public in a comprehensible manner.

Use copy Restrictions unspecified star MiAaHDL

Electronic reproduction. [S.l.] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010. MiAaHDL

Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. MiAaHDL

http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212

digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve pda MiAaHDL

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library