Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context : studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht / edited by Stacey Katz Bourns, Harvard University ; Lindsy L. Myers, University of Missouri, Kansas City.

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Pragmatics & beyond ; v. 244.Publisher: Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2014]Copyright date: ©2014Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9789027270597
  • 9027270597
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and ContextDDC classification:
  • 415 23
LOC classification:
  • P291
Online resources:
Contents:
Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; References; Acknowledgements; I. Grammatical constructions; The information structure of ditransitives: Informing scope properties and long-distance dependency constraints ; 1. Introduction; 2. What is information structure?; 3. Topicality and quantifier scope; 4. The ditransitive construction; 4.1 Ditransitive construction and scope facts; 4.2 Interaction of the ditransitive with questions, passives; 5. Conclusion; References.
Non-promotional passives and unspecified subject constructions: Navigating the typological Kuiper Belt1. Introduction; 2. The Irish autonomous construction; 3. Polish vs. Ukrainian; 4. The Icelandic "New Impersonal" construction; 5. The -ya construction in Northern and Central Pomo: Passive or active?; 5.1 Syntactic properties of the unexpressed argument; 5.2 Semantic properties of the unexpressed argument; 5.3 Other subject properties; 5.4 Anomalies; 6. Conclusion ; References.
On the relationship between sentence focus category, subject-verb order, and genericity: A preliminary analysis of some Italian unaccusatives 1. Introduction; 2. Genericity, sentence focus category, and subject-verb inversion ; 2.1 Genericity ; 2.2 Sentence focus category and subject-verb order ; 2.2.1 Sentence focus category; 2.2.2 Postverbal subject position; 3. SF and VS order in unaccusatives denoting change of location and change of state ; 3.1 Particular (specific) sentences ; 3.2 Characterizing (generic) sentences.
4. SF and VS order in Italian unaccusatives denoting lack/absence and necessity 4.1 Mancare and servire in particular sentences ; 4.2 Mancare and servire in characterizing sentences; 5. Discussion ; 5.1 Characterizing sentences cannot be focal; 5.2 Unaccusatives of change of location/state vis-à-vis mancare and servire; 6. Conclusion; References; Frames and the interpretation of omitted arguments in English; 1. Introduction; 2. A taxonomy of omissions; 2.1 Complications; 2.1.1 Difficulties identifying the interpretation type; 2.1.2 Non-instantiation.
3. Predicting the interpretation type of a null complement3.1 The framal implicational account; 3.2 Accounting for exceptions; 4. Competing explanations; 4.1 Selectional restrictions ; 4.2 The Aktionsart-based account; 5. Motivating the frame-based generalization; 6. Narrow scope generalizations; 7. Conclusion; References; Interactive frames and grammatical constructions; 1. Introduction; 2. Interactive frames; 3. Connecting grammatical constructions to interactive frames ; 4. Right dislocations in French assessments; 4.1 The paradoxical functions of RD in French discourse.
Summary: A number of studies of Left Dislocation (LD) in spoken French within the Interactional Linguistics (IL) framework (de Fornel 1988; Pekarek Doehler 2001; Chevalier 2011b) have been critical of the information-structure analyses of this construction as set forth in Lambrecht (1981, 1994) and Barnes (1985). This discussion attempts to clarify the original information-structure analysis, arguing that the pragmatic definition of LD should be limited to the explicit marking of the sentence-topic and its associated comment. This topic-comment configuration is compatible with a large variety of partic.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books EBSCO Available

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Print version record.

A number of studies of Left Dislocation (LD) in spoken French within the Interactional Linguistics (IL) framework (de Fornel 1988; Pekarek Doehler 2001; Chevalier 2011b) have been critical of the information-structure analyses of this construction as set forth in Lambrecht (1981, 1994) and Barnes (1985). This discussion attempts to clarify the original information-structure analysis, arguing that the pragmatic definition of LD should be limited to the explicit marking of the sentence-topic and its associated comment. This topic-comment configuration is compatible with a large variety of partic.

Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; References; Acknowledgements; I. Grammatical constructions; The information structure of ditransitives: Informing scope properties and long-distance dependency constraints ; 1. Introduction; 2. What is information structure?; 3. Topicality and quantifier scope; 4. The ditransitive construction; 4.1 Ditransitive construction and scope facts; 4.2 Interaction of the ditransitive with questions, passives; 5. Conclusion; References.

Non-promotional passives and unspecified subject constructions: Navigating the typological Kuiper Belt1. Introduction; 2. The Irish autonomous construction; 3. Polish vs. Ukrainian; 4. The Icelandic "New Impersonal" construction; 5. The -ya construction in Northern and Central Pomo: Passive or active?; 5.1 Syntactic properties of the unexpressed argument; 5.2 Semantic properties of the unexpressed argument; 5.3 Other subject properties; 5.4 Anomalies; 6. Conclusion ; References.

On the relationship between sentence focus category, subject-verb order, and genericity: A preliminary analysis of some Italian unaccusatives 1. Introduction; 2. Genericity, sentence focus category, and subject-verb inversion ; 2.1 Genericity ; 2.2 Sentence focus category and subject-verb order ; 2.2.1 Sentence focus category; 2.2.2 Postverbal subject position; 3. SF and VS order in unaccusatives denoting change of location and change of state ; 3.1 Particular (specific) sentences ; 3.2 Characterizing (generic) sentences.

4. SF and VS order in Italian unaccusatives denoting lack/absence and necessity 4.1 Mancare and servire in particular sentences ; 4.2 Mancare and servire in characterizing sentences; 5. Discussion ; 5.1 Characterizing sentences cannot be focal; 5.2 Unaccusatives of change of location/state vis-à-vis mancare and servire; 6. Conclusion; References; Frames and the interpretation of omitted arguments in English; 1. Introduction; 2. A taxonomy of omissions; 2.1 Complications; 2.1.1 Difficulties identifying the interpretation type; 2.1.2 Non-instantiation.

3. Predicting the interpretation type of a null complement3.1 The framal implicational account; 3.2 Accounting for exceptions; 4. Competing explanations; 4.1 Selectional restrictions ; 4.2 The Aktionsart-based account; 5. Motivating the frame-based generalization; 6. Narrow scope generalizations; 7. Conclusion; References; Interactive frames and grammatical constructions; 1. Introduction; 2. Interactive frames; 3. Connecting grammatical constructions to interactive frames ; 4. Right dislocations in French assessments; 4.1 The paradoxical functions of RD in French discourse.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library