Judicial Power and Institutional Constraints : a Comparison of Canadian and American Courts.

By:

Hurl, Ryan

Material type: Text

TextSeries: Recht und GesellschaftPublication details: El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, 2010.Description: 1 online resource (312 pages)Content type:

text

Media type:

computer

Carrier type:

online resource

ISBN:

9781593326500
1593326505

Subject(s): Genre/Form:

Additional physical formats: Print version:: Judicial Power and Institutional Constraints : A Comparison of Canadian and American Courts.DDC classification:

347.71/012 347.71012

LOC classification:

KDZ608 .H87 2010

Online resources:

Click here to access online

Contents:

List of Tables; Chapter One: Introduction; Chapter Two: The Institutional Limits of Judicial Politics; Chapter Three: Constitutional Constraints and IndIAN Law inCanada and the United States; Chapter FOUR: The Limits of Environmental LAW in Canadaand the United States; Chapter Five: Conclusion; Appendices; Bibliography; Index.

Summary: Hurl argues that the impact of law and politics on judicial decision making is dependent upon the broader institutional environments that courts operate within. Through an examination environmental and Indian law decisions, he explores how judicial power in Canada and the United States is shaped by the constitutional structure of the two regimes. His work is based on an analysis of environmental and Indian law decisions decided by the Supreme Courts of Canada and the United States between 1985 and 2008, supplemented by an analysis of environmental policy cases decided by American and Canadian.

Item type:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	Status	Date due	Barcode
Electronic-Books	OPJGU Sonepat- Campus	E-Books EBSCO			Available

Hurl argues that the impact of law and politics on judicial decision making is dependent upon the broader institutional environments that courts operate within. Through an examination environmental and Indian law decisions, he explores how judicial power in Canada and the United States is shaped by the constitutional structure of the two regimes. His work is based on an analysis of environmental and Indian law decisions decided by the Supreme Courts of Canada and the United States between 1985 and 2008, supplemented by an analysis of environmental policy cases decided by American and Canadian.