The specter of dictatorship : judicial enabling of presidential power / David M. Driesen.
Material type: TextLanguage: English Series: Stanford studies in law and politics | Stanford studies in law and politicsPublication details: Stanford : Stanford University Press, 2021.ISBN:- 9781503628618
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus Main Library | General Books | 342.73062 DR-S (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 146791 |
Browsing OPJGU Sonepat- Campus shelves, Collection: General Books Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
342.73029 BE-E Economic interpretation of the constitution of the United States | 342.73041 FA-L Law and public policy | 342.730412 PO-T Terror in the balance : security, liberty, and the courts / | 342.73062 DR-S The specter of dictatorship : judicial enabling of presidential power / | 342.73083 ST-L Local citizenship in a global age / | 342.73085 FA-N Nature of constitutional rights the invention and logic of strict judicial scrutiny | 342.730858 SO-P Privacy, information and technology |
"Reveals how the U.S. Supreme Court's presidentialism threatens our democracy and what to do about it. Donald Trump's presidency made many Americans wonder whether our system of checks and balances would prove robust enough to withstand an onslaught from a despotic chief executive. In The Specter of Dictatorship, David Driesen analyzes the chief executive's role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey and argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Their experiences suggest, Driesen shows, that the Court must eschew its reliance on and expansion of the "unitary executive theory" recently endorsed by the Court and apply a less deferential approach to presidential authority, invoked to protect national security and combat emergencies, than it has in recent years. Ultimately, Driesen argues that concern about loss of democracy should play a major role in the Court's jurisprudence, because loss of democracy can prove irreversible. As autocracy spreads throughout the world, maintaining our democracy has become an urgent matter"--
There are no comments on this title.