Language of politics studies in quantitative semantics
Material type:
TextSeries: Library of policy sciencesPublication details: Cambridge MIT Press 1949Description: 398p. diagrs. 23 cmSubject(s): DDC classification: - 320.1 22 LA-L
Print
| Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Print
|
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus FOB Library | Special Collection - Indiana University | 320.1 LA-L (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan | 010073 | ||
|
Print
|
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus FOB Library | Special Collection - Indiana University | 320.1 LA-L (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan | 010072 |
"Most of the work ... was done at the University of Chicago or in connection with the War Communications Research Project at the Library of Congress"
Bibliographical references included in "Notes" (p. 382-398)
Introduction: The language of power, by H. D. Lasswell. Style in the language of politics, by H. D. Lasswell. Why be quantitative? By H. D. Lasswell.--Technique: The problem of validating content analysis, by I. L. Janis. The reliability of content analysis categories, by Abraham Kaplan and J. M. Goldsen. Recording and context units, four ways of coding editorial content, by Alan Grey, David Kaplan and H. D. Lasswell. The feasibility of the use of samples in content analysis, by Alexander Mintz. The coefficient of imbalance, by I. L. Janis and Raymond Fadner.--Applications: Detection; propaganda detection and the courts, by H. D. Lasswell. Trend; May Day slogans in Soviet Russia, 1918-1943, by Sergius Yakobson and H. D. Lasswell. Interaction; the Third International on its change of policy, by Nathan Leites. Interaction; the response of communist propaganda to frustration, by Nathan Leites and I. de Sola Pool.
There are no comments on this title.