Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review

By:

Knight, Dean R (Dean Robert)

Material type: Text

TextSeries: Cambridge studies in constitutional law ; 19Publication details: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2018ISBN:

9781107190245

Subject(s):

LOC classification:

K3175 .K65 2018

Contents:

Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; 2. Scope of review; 3. Grounds of review; 4. Intensity of review; 5. Contextual review; 6. Conclusion.

Summary: "The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the Anglo-Commonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. While variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review"--Summary: "The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the anglocommonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. while variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review. Dean R. Knight is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Law and Co-Director of the New Zealand Centre for Public Law at Victoria University of Wellington. His scholarly interests include a wide range of topics in constitutional and administrative law, including judicial review and local democracy"--

Item type:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title.

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Print	OPJGU Sonepat- Campus Main Library	General Books	347.12 KN-V (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available		138621

Browsing OPJGU Sonepat- Campus shelves, Collection: General Books Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous			No cover image available				No cover image available	Next
Previous	347.12 GL- Global expansion of judicial power	347.12 JU- Judicial review in the new millennium	347.12 JU- Judicial review process, powers, and problems	347.12 KN-V Vigilance and restraint in the common law of judicial review	347.12 KO-P Perils of judicial self-government in transitional societies holding the least accountable branch to account	347.12 LA- Law, justice and judicial power Justice PN Bhagwati's approach	347.12 MC-J Judicial review in the english-speaking world	Next

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; 2. Scope of review; 3. Grounds of review; 4. Intensity of review; 5. Contextual review; 6. Conclusion.

"The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the Anglo-Commonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. While variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review"--

"The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the anglocommonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. while variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review. Dean R. Knight is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Law and Co-Director of the New Zealand Centre for Public Law at Victoria University of Wellington. His scholarly interests include a wide range of topics in constitutional and administrative law, including judicial review and local democracy"--

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.