Paradox of liberation secular revolutions and religious counterrevolutions
Material type: TextPublication details: New Haven Yale University Press 2015ISBN:- 9780300187809
- JF60 .W35 2015
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus Main Library | General Books | 320.91724 WA-P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | Replaced by 20161420 | 014942 | |||
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus Main Library | General Books | 320.91724 WA-P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 134945 | ||||
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus Main Library | General Books | 320.91724 WA-P (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | Amount deducted by Finance from (91185) | 131891 |
Browsing OPJGU Sonepat- Campus shelves, Collection: General Books Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
320.91724 PO- Politics in the developing world | 320.91724 PO- Politics in the developing world | 320.91724 WA-P Paradox of liberation secular revolutions and religious counterrevolutions | 320.91724 WA-P Paradox of liberation secular revolutions and religious counterrevolutions | 320.91724 WA-P Paradox of liberation secular revolutions and religious counterrevolutions | 320.91724 WA-P Paradox of liberation secular revolutions and religious counterrevolutions | 320.9174927 AY-O Over-stating the Arab state politics and society in the middle east |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
"Many of the successful campaigns for national liberation in the years following World War II were initially based on democratic and secular ideals. Once established, however, the newly independent nations had to deal with entirely unexpected religious fierceness. Michael Walzer, one of America's foremost political thinkers, examines this perplexing trend by studying India, Israel, and Algeria, three nations whose founding principles and institutions have been sharply attacked by three completely different groups of religious revivalists: Hindu militants, ultra-Orthodox Jews and messianic Zionists, and Islamic radicals. In his provocative, well-reasoned discussion, Walzer asks why these secular democratic movements have failed to sustain their hegemony: Why have they been unable to reproduce their political culture beyond one or two generations? In a postscript, he compares the difficulties of contemporary secularism to the successful establishment of secular politics in the early American republic--thereby making an argument for American exceptionalism but gravely noting that we may be less exceptional today"--
There are no comments on this title.