Arguments, stories and criminal evidence a formal hybrid theory
Material type: TextSeries: Law and philosophy libraryPublication details: New York Springer 2011Description: x,294pISBN:- 9789400701397
- 345.60942 22 BE-A
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus Main Library | General Books | 345.60942 BE-A (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Checked out | 05/09/2023 | 121677 |
Browsing OPJGU Sonepat- Campus shelves, Collection: General Books Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
345.6 JA-I Internationalisation of criminal evidence beyond the common law and civil law traditions | 345.6 PA-C Criminal accusation political rationales and socio-legal practices | 345.6 PR- Principles of evidence in international criminal justice | 345.60942 BE-A Arguments, stories and criminal evidence a formal hybrid theory | 345.60942 MA-C Criminal evidence | 345.62 BA-L Lie detection and the law torture, technology and truth | 345.6435094 GA-G Goyle`s law of easements & licences |
License restrictions may limit access.
Annotation In this book a theory of reasoning with evidence in the context of criminal cases is developed. The main subject of this study is not the law of evidence but rather the rational process of proof, which involves constructing, testing and justifying scenarios about what happened using evidence and commonsense knowledge. A central theme in the book is the analysis of ones reasoning, so that complex patterns are made more explicit and clear. This analysis uses stories about what happened and arguments to anchor these stories in evidence. Thus the argumentative and the narrative approaches from the research in legal philosophy and legal psychology are combined.Because the book describes its subjects in both an informal and a formal style, it is relevant for scholars in legal philosophy, AI, logic and argumentation theory. The book can also appeal to practitioners in the investigative and legal professions, who are interested in the ways in which they can and should reason with evidence.
Scholarly & Professional Springer
There are no comments on this title.