Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

United States law and policy on transitional justice principles, politics, and pragmatics Zachary D. Kaufman.

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: 2016 London Oxford University PressDescription: 1 online resourceISBN:
  • 9780190243524
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Print version :: No titleDDC classification:
  • 345.730231 23
LOC classification:
  • KF9390 .K38 2016
Online resources: Summary: In this book Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government's support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of transitional justice options (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II. This book challenges the 'legalist' paradigm, which postulates that liberal states pursue war crimes tribunals because their decision-makers hold a principled commitment to the rule of law. Kaufman develops an alternative theory, 'prudentialism', which contends that any state (liberal or illiberal) may support bona fide war crimes tribunals.
Item type: Electronic-Books
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title.
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books Perpetual 345.730231 KA-U (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 700812

Includes bibliographical references and index.

In this book Zachary D. Kaufman explores the U.S. government's support for, or opposition to, certain transitional justice institutions. By first presenting an overview of transitional justice options (such as war crimes tribunals) and then analyzing six historical case studies, Kaufman evaluates why and how the United States has pursued particular transitional justice options since World War II. This book challenges the 'legalist' paradigm, which postulates that liberal states pursue war crimes tribunals because their decision-makers hold a principled commitment to the rule of law. Kaufman develops an alternative theory, 'prudentialism', which contends that any state (liberal or illiberal) may support bona fide war crimes tribunals.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library