Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements Ronald A. Brand, Scott R. Jablonski.

By:

Brand, Ronald A

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

TextSeries: CILE studies ; v. 4.Publication details: London Oxford University Press 2007Description: 1 online resource (xv, 342 p.)ISBN:

9780199855346

Subject(s):

Additional physical formats: Print version: No titleDDC classification:

340.9 23 BR-F

LOC classification:

K7625 .B73 2007

Online resources:

Oxford scholarship online

Summary: Giving an in-depth analysis of the doctrine of forum non conveniens as it has evolved, this book focuses on four major common law countries - UK, US, Canada, and Australia. It analyzes the similarities and differences of the doctrine among those four countries, comparing this to analogous laws found in civil law countries.

Item type:

Electronic-Books

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title.

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Electronic-Books	OPJGU Sonepat- Campus	E-Books Perpetual	340.9 BR-F (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available		700984

Browsing OPJGU Sonepat- Campus shelves, Collection: E-Books Perpetual Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous								Next
Previous	340.82 MO-F First women lawyers a comparative study of gender, law and the legal professions	340.9 AB-L Linkages and boundaries in private and public international law	340.9 BR-C Conflict of laws	340.9 BR-F Forum non conveniens history, global practice, and future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements	340.9 CO- Commercial issues in private international law a common law perspective	340.9 FA-U Using international law in domestic courts	340.9 GE- Geography of law landscape, identity and regulation	Next

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Giving an in-depth analysis of the doctrine of forum non conveniens as it has evolved, this book focuses on four major common law countries - UK, US, Canada, and Australia. It analyzes the similarities and differences of the doctrine among those four countries, comparing this to analogous laws found in civil law countries.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.