MARC details
000 -LEADER |
fixed length control field |
01747nam a22002177a 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
control field |
JGU |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
control field |
20240917151909.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
240917b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER |
International Standard Book Number |
9781108482363 |
Qualifying information |
pbk. |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
Language of cataloging |
eng |
Transcribing agency |
JGU |
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE |
Language code of text/sound track or separate title |
eng |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
Personal name |
Magnusson, William, |
9 (RLIN) |
1664748 |
Relator term |
author |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
Title |
Blockchain democracy : |
Remainder of title |
technology, law and the rule of the crowd / |
Statement of responsibility, etc |
William Magnuson. |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
Place of publication, distribution, etc |
New York : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc |
Cambridge University Press, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc |
2020. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Summary, etc |
"At 2:10 p.m. on October 31, 2008, a message popped up on an obscure cryptology mailing list. The message was written by a man going by the name of Satoshi Nakamoto. Nakamoto had never posted to the site before, and he was entirely unknown to its participants. But in his message, he made a bold claim. "I've been working on a new electronic cash system that's fully peer-to-peer, with no trusted third party," he wrote. It was now ready to be unveiled to the world. He included a link to a nine-page white paper bearing the title "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System." In the paper, Nakamoto outlined in crisp and uncluttered English his idea for a new kind of digital money. This money, or bitcoin as Nakamoto called it, would allow people to send money directly to each other over the internet. Banks would have no control over the system, and neither would governments. It would be run, instead, by everyone. Bitcoins would be a kind of pure money, completely democratic, with minimal transaction costs, no middlemen, and completely digital"-- |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Cryptocurrencies--Law and legislation. |
9 (RLIN) |
1664999 |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Blockchains (Databases)--Law and legislation. |
9 (RLIN) |
62895 |